The AI-powered text editors of tomorrow.
链接到某一部分IDEs Experience & Sentiment
Cursor has a dominant awareness lead, with 82.2% of respondents having used it or heard of it, versus just 54.1% for runner-up Zed.
When looking at freeform comments left about Cursor, it seems like the main issue is actually its price, indicating that the market might have room for a cheaper alternative.
通过...分组：
根据此项排序:
经验
- <span aria-hidden="true">🤓</span> 用过: 使用过此项目的受访者。
- <span aria-hidden="true">👀</span> 有听说过: 听说过此项目，但没有使用过此项目的受访者。
- <span aria-hidden="true">🤷</span> 没听说过: 从未听说过此项目的受访者。
情绪（态度）
- 积极: 有兴趣了解此技术，或者愿意再次使用它的受访者
- 中立: 未对此技术发表看法的受访者
- 消极: 对此技术不感兴趣，或者使用此技术有糟糕体验的受访者
💡
你可以单击任何技术的名称， 来获得额外的详细信息，并更深入地查看其相关数据。
链接到某一部分Other IDEs
What other IDEs are you currently using?
(自由提问)
Multiple
链接到某一部分Number of Items
How many items in this category respondents have used.
链接到某一部分IDEs Pain Points
Context & memory limitations were the main thing currently preventing web developers from using dedicated IDEs to code, followed by too many intrusive suggestions as well as the high cost associated with AI IDEs.
Which pain points have you encountered when using AI-focused IDEs and editors?
(自由提问)
Multiple