The AI-powered text editors of tomorrow.
Link către secțiuneIDEs Experience & Sentiment
Cursor has a dominant awareness lead, with 82.2% of respondents having used it or heard of it, versus just 54.1% for runner-up Zed.
When looking at freeform comments left about Cursor, it seems like the main issue is actually its price, indicating that the market might have room for a cheaper alternative.
Group by:
Sort by:
Experience
- Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
- Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
- Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.
Sentiment
- Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
- Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
- Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
💡
Poți da click pe numele oricărei tehnologii pentru mai multe detalii și pentru o viziune comprehensivă a datelor.
Link către secțiuneOther IDEs
What other IDEs are you currently using?
(întrebare deschisă)
Multiple
Link către secțiuneNumber of Items
How many items in this category respondents have used.
Link către secțiuneIDEs Pain Points
Context & memory limitations were the main thing currently preventing web developers from using dedicated IDEs to code, followed by too many intrusive suggestions as well as the high cost associated with AI IDEs.
Which pain points have you encountered when using AI-focused IDEs and editors?
(întrebare deschisă)
Multiple