Ir al contenido

IDEs & Editors

The AI-powered text editors of tomorrow.

IDEs Experience & Sentiment

Cursor has a dominant awareness lead, with 82.2% of respondents having used it or heard of it, versus just 54.1% for runner-up Zed.

When looking at freeform comments left about Cursor, it seems like the main issue is actually its price, indicating that the market might have room for a cheaper alternative.

Group by:

Sort by:

33.1%
48.5%
17.8%
4,018
17.3%
36.3%
45.9%
4,009
7.5%
26.1%
65.9%
4,014
10.3%
88.9%
4,012

Experience

  • Used it: Respondents who have used an item.
  • Heard of it: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
  • Never heard of it: Respondents who have never heard about an item.

Sentiment

  • Positive: Respondents who are interested in learning more about a technology; or are willing to use it again.
  • Neutral: Responents who did not indicate any sentiment about a technology.
  • Negative: Respondents who are not interested in learning more about a technology; or have used it and had a negative experience.
💡
Puedes hacer clic en el nombre de cualquier tecnología para obtener detalles adicionales y una mirada más profunda a sus datos relacionados.
What other IDEs are you currently using?
Freeform
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
13

Other Answers

Answers matching “Other Answers” 132
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% de respuestas respondidas

Number of Items

How many items in this category respondents have used.

0%
12%
23%
35%
47%
58%
1

0

2,436
2

1

1,243
3

2

396
4

3

98
5

4

8
0%
12%
23%
35%
47%
58%
% de encuestados

IDEs Pain Points

Context & memory limitations were the main thing currently preventing web developers from using dedicated IDEs to code, followed by too many intrusive suggestions as well as the high cost associated with AI IDEs.

Which pain points have you encountered when using AI-focused IDEs and editors?
Freeform
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1

Context & memory limitations

2

Intrusive or distracting suggestions

3

High monetary cost

4

Poor generated code quality

5

Poor UI/UX

6

Hallucination & inaccuracies

7

Lack of codebase awareness

8

Slow response time

9

Bad at modifying code

10

Cursor issues

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% de respuestas respondidas