Μετάβαση στο περιεχόμενο

IDEs & Editors

The AI-powered text editors of tomorrow.

IDEs Experience & Sentiment

Cursor has a dominant awareness lead, with 82.2% of respondents having used it or heard of it, versus just 54.1% for runner-up Zed.

When looking at freeform comments left about Cursor, it seems like the main issue is actually its price, indicating that the market might have room for a cheaper alternative.

Group by:

Sort by:

33.1%
48.5%
17.8%
4,018
17.3%
36.3%
45.9%
4,009
7.5%
26.1%
65.9%
4,014
10.3%
88.9%
4,012

Εμπειρία

  • Το έχω χρησιμοποιήσει: Respondents who have used an item.
  • Το έχω ακουστά: Respondents who have heard about an item, but haven't used it.
  • Δεν το έχω ακουστά: Respondents who have never heard about an item.

Γνώμη

  • Θετική: Συμμετέχοντες οι οποίοι ενδιαφέρονται να μάθουν περισσότερα για μία τεχνολογία, ή θα ήθελαν να την ξαναχρησιμοποιήσουν.
  • Ουδέτερη: Συμμετέχοντες οι οποίοι δεν έδειξαν κάποιο συναίσθημα για μία τεχνολογία.
  • Αρνητική: Συμμετέχοντες οι οποίοι δεν ενδιαφέρονται να μάθουν περισσότερα για μία τεχνολογία, ή την έχουν χρησιμοποιήσει και είχαν αρνητική εμπειρία.
💡
You can click on any technology name to get extra details and a more in-depth look at its related data.

Other IDEs

What other IDEs are you currently using?
Freeform
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
13

Other Answers

Answers matching “Other Answers” 132
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% of question respondents

Number of Items

How many items in this category respondents have used.

0%
12%
23%
35%
47%
58%
1

0

2,436
2

1

1,243
3

2

396
4

3

98
5

4

8
0%
12%
23%
35%
47%
58%
% of survey respondents

IDEs Pain Points

Context & memory limitations were the main thing currently preventing web developers from using dedicated IDEs to code, followed by too many intrusive suggestions as well as the high cost associated with AI IDEs.

Which pain points have you encountered when using AI-focused IDEs and editors?
Freeform
Multiple
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1

Context & memory limitations

2

Intrusive or distracting suggestions

3

High monetary cost

4

Poor generated code quality

5

Poor UI/UX

6

Hallucination & inaccuracies

7

Lack of codebase awareness

8

Slow response time

9

Bad at modifying code

10

Cursor issues

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% of question respondents